4.7 Article

National-scale analysis of simulated hydrological droughts (1891-2015)

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 550, 期 -, 页码 368-385

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.018

关键词

Drought severity; River flow modelling; Low flow; Soil moisture; Drought characteristics; Great Britain

资金

  1. UK Natural Environment Research Council as part of the UK Drought and Water Scarcity programme [NE/L010208/1]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/L010364/1, NE/L010208/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [NE/L010364/1, NE/L010208/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Droughts are phenomena that affect people and ecosystems in a variety of ways. One way to help with resilience to future droughts is to understand the characteristics of historic droughts and how these have changed over the recent past. Although, on average, Great Britain experiences a relatively wet climate it is also prone to periods of low rainfall which can lead to droughts. Until recently research into droughts of Great Britain has been neglected compared to other natural hazards such as storms and floods. This study is the first to use a national-scale gridded hydrological model to characterise droughts across Great Britain over the last century. Firstly, the model performance at low flows is assessed and it is found that the model can simulate low flows well in many catchments across Great Britain. Next, the threshold level method is applied to time series of monthly mean river flow and soil moisture to identify historic droughts (1891-2015). It is shown that the national-scale gridded output can be used to identify historic drought periods. A quantitative assessment of drought characteristics shows that groundwater dependent areas typically experience more severe droughts, which have longer durations rather than higher intensities. There is substantial spatial and temporal variability in the drought characteristics, but there are no consistent changes through time. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据