4.6 Article

400 pc Imaging of a Massive Quasar Host Galaxy at a Redshift of 6.6

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 874, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab11cc

关键词

cosmology: observations; galaxies: active; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: ISM; galaxies: star formation; quasars: individual (VIK J030516.92-315056)

资金

  1. ERC grant Cosmic Gas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report high spatial resolution (similar to 0.'' 076, 410 pc) Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array imaging of the dust continuum and the ionized carbon line [C II] in a luminous quasar host galaxy at z = 6.6, 800 million years after the big bang. Based on previous studies, this galaxy hosts a similar to 1 x 10(9) M-circle dot black hole and has a star formation rate of similar to 1500 M-circle dot yr(-1). The unprecedented high resolution of the observations reveals a complex morphology of gas within 3 kpc of the accreting central black hole. The gas has a high velocity dispersion with little ordered motion along the line of sight, as would be expected from gas accretion that has yet to settle in a disk. In addition, we find the presence of [C II] cavities in the gas distribution (with diameters of similar to 0.5 kpc), offset from the central black hole. This unique distribution and kinematics cannot be explained by a simple model. Plausible scenarios are that the gas is located in a truncated or warped disk, or the holes are created by interactions with nearby galaxies or due to energy injection into the gas. In the latter case, the energy required to form the cavities must originate from the central active galactic nucleus, as the required energy far exceeds the energy output expected from supernovae. This energy input into the gas, however, does not inhibit the high rate of star formation. Both star formation and black hole activity could have been triggered by interactions with satellite galaxies; our data reveal three additional companions detected in [C II] emission around the quasar.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据