4.7 Article

CIRCexplorer3: A CLEAR Pipeline for Direct Comparison of Circular and Linear RNA Expression

期刊

GENOMICS PROTEOMICS & BIOINFORMATICS
卷 17, 期 5, 页码 511-521

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gpb.2019.11.004

关键词

Circular RNA; Back-splicing; Linear RNA; Pre-mRNA splicing; Ribo(-) RNA-seq

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China [XDB19020104]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31730111, 31925011, 91940306]
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute International Program, the United States [55008728]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sequences of circular RNAs (circRNAs) produced from back-splicing of exon(s) completely overlap with those from cognate linear RNAs transcribed from the same gene loci with the exception of their back-splicing junction (BSJ) sites. Therefore, examination of global circRNA expression from RNA-seq datasets generally relies on the detection of RNA-seq fragments spanning BSJ sites, which is different from the quantification of linear RNA expression by normalized RNA-seq fragments mapped to whole gene bodies. Thus, direct comparison of circular and linear RNA expression from the same gene loci in a genome-wide manner has remained challenging. Here, we update the previously-reported CIRCexplorer pipeline to version 3 for circular and linear RNA expression analysis from ribosomal-RNA depleted RNA-seq (CIRCexplorer3-CLEAR). A new quantitation parameter, fragments per billion mapped bases (FPB), is applied to evaluate circular and linear RNA expression individually by fragments mapped to circRNA-specific BSJ sites or to linear RNA-specific splicing junction (SJ) sites. Comparison of circular and linear RNA expression levels is directly achieved by dividing FPBcirc by FPBlinear to generate a CIRCscore, which indicates the relative circRNA expression level using linear RNA expression level as the background. Highly-expressed circRNAs with low cognate linear RNA expression background can be readily identified by CIRCexplorer3-CLEAR for further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据