4.6 Article

NICER X-Ray Observations of Seven Nearby Rotation-powered Millisecond Pulsars

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 887, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab511b

关键词

-

资金

  1. French Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES)
  2. NASA through the NICER mission
  3. NASA through the Astrophysics Explorers Program
  4. NSF Physics Frontiers Center [1430284]
  5. Programme National de Cosmologie et Galaxies (PNCG) of CNRS/INSU, France
  6. Programme National Hautes Energies (PNHE) of CNRS/INSU, France
  7. Programme National Gravitation, References, Astronomie, Metrologie (PNGRAM) of CNRS/INSU, France
  8. Programme National High Energies (PNHE) of CNRS/INSU
  9. INP
  10. IN2P3
  11. CEA
  12. CNES
  13. STFC [ST/R00045X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Neutron star Interior Composition Explorer observed several rotation-powered millisecond pulsars (MSPs) to search for or confirm the presence of X-ray pulsations. When broad and sine-like, these pulsations may indicate thermal emission from hot polar caps at the magnetic poles on the neutron star surface. We report confident detections (>= 4.7 sigma after background filtering) of X-ray pulsations for five of the seven pulsars in our target sample: PSR J0614-3329, PSR J0636+5129, PSR J0751+1807, PSR J1012+5307, and PSR J2241-5236, while PSR J1552+5437 and PSR J1744-1134 remain undetected. Of those, only PSR J0751+1807 and PSR J1012+5307 had pulsations previously detected at the 1.7 sigma and almost 3 sigma confidence levels, respectively, in XMM-Newton data. All detected sources exhibit broad sine-like pulses, which are indicative of surface thermal radiation. As such, these MSPs are promising targets for future X-ray observations aimed at constraining the neutron star mass-radius relation and the dense matter equation of state using detailed pulse profile modeling. Furthermore, we find that three of the detected MSPs exhibit a significant phase offset between their X-ray and radio pulses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据