4.7 Article

An improved pre-clinical patient-derived liquid xenograft mouse model for acute myeloid leukemia

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13045-017-0532-x

关键词

Acute myeloid leukemia; Patient-derived xenograft; Leukemic stem cells; Tyrosine kinase inhibitors

资金

  1. National Research Foundation Fellowship Singapore [NRF-NRFF2017-03]
  2. Joint Council Office Development Programme, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore [1334 k00082]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Xenotransplantation of patient-derived AML (acute myeloid leukemia) cells in NOD-scid Il2r gamma(null) (NSG) mice is the method of choice for evaluating this human hematologic malignancy. However, existing models constructed using intravenous injection in adult or newborn NSG mice have inferior engraftment efficiency, poor peripheral blood engraftment, or are difficult to construct. Methods: Here, we describe an improved AML xenograft model where primary human AML cells were injected into NSG newborn pups intrahepatically. Results: Introduction of primary cells from AML patients resulted in high levels of engraftment in peripheral blood, spleen, and bone marrow (BM) of recipient mice. The phenotype of engrafted AML cells remained unaltered during serial transplantation. The mice developed features that are consistent with human AML including spleen enlargement and infiltration of AML cells into multiple organs. Importantly, we demonstrated that although leukemic stem cell activity is enriched and mediated by CD34(+)CD117(+) subpopulation, CD34(+)CD117(-) subpopulation can acquire CD34(+)CD117(+) phenotype through de-differentiation. Lastly, we evaluated the therapeutic potential of Sorafenib and Regorafenib in this AML model and found that periphery and spleen AML cells are sensitive to these treatments, whereas BM provides a protective environment to AML. Conclusions: Collectively, our improved model is robust, easy-to-construct, and reliable for pre-clinical AML studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据