4.7 Article

Use of filtration techniques to study environmental fate of engineered metallic nanoparticles: Factors affecting filter performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 322, 期 -, 页码 105-117

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.098

关键词

Filtration; Silver; Cerium dioxide; Nanoparticles; Retention

资金

  1. Special Research Fund of Ghent University [BOF 10/STA/087]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examined the filtration of aqueous suspensions of negatively charged (citrate-stabilized) Ag (14.5 +/- 1.1 nm) and positively charged CeO2 (7.3 +/- 1.4 nm) engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) via different filtration techniques such as paper filtration, micro- and ultrafiltration, and evaluated the impact of initial concentration, matrix composition, and filter type and (pre-)treatment, on nanoparticle retention. Solutions of Ag+ and Ce3+ ions were tested in the same way. Significant retention of nanoparticles was observed even for filters having considerably larger pore sizes than the ENPs size. Retention also seemingly increased with decreasing initial concentration, but generally decreased upon preconditioning of the paper or membrane filters with diluted nitric acid or 0.1 M Cu(NO3)(2), respectively. In ultrapure water, retention appeared to depend more on particle characteristics than on a membrane type. However, in 2 mM KNO3, NaCl, or CaCl2, more significant differences in recovery were observed between different membrane materials. Additionally, background electrolytes might reduce nanoparticle or ionic retention, but could also affect their (colloidal) stability, e.g., resulting in enhanced retention of Ag ENPs and Ag+ ions in chloride-containing matrices. Results from centrifugal ultrafiltration recommend using 10 kDa filters for nanoparticle removal from the solution, and suggest these filters might potentially be suitable to differentiate between (nano)particulate and dissolved species. (C) 2016 Elsevier S.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据