4.7 Article

Synthesis of magnetic graphene oxide grafted polymaleicamide dendrimer nanohybrids for adsorption of Pb(II) in aqueous solution

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 340, 期 -, 页码 407-416

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.07.026

关键词

Graphene oxide; Fe3O4 nanoparticles; Polymaleicamide dendrimer; Adsorption; Pb(II)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51403091]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2015M572616]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, using maleic anhydride and ethylenediamine as functional monomers, graphene oxide (GO) loaded magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles modified by (3-Aminopropyl) triethoxysilane as support, magnetic graphene oxide grafted polymaleicamide dendrimer (GO/Fe3O4-g-PMAAM) nanohybrids were fabricated by divergent method and magnetic separation technology. The obtained samples were characterized by transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, elementary analyzer and vibrating sample magnetometer. The effects of PMAAM generations, solution pH, Pb(II) initial concentration, temperature and contact time on the adsorption property of the samples for Pb(II) in aqueous solution were studied. The results demonstrated that nitrogen content and adsorption capacity of the as-synthesized samples with amino terminal groups were all higher than their adjacent generations PMAAM with carboxyl terminal groups. Moreover, with increasing generations of PMAAM grafted on to the GO/Fe3O4, the nitrogen content and the adsorption capacity of the samples with the same terminal groups gradually increased. The maximum adsorption capacity of GO/Fe3O4-g-G3.0 for Pb(II) was 181.4 mg g(-1) at 298K. The rising of temperature was beneficial for the adsorption. The adsorption kinetics had a better agreement with pseudo-second-order equation, and equilibrium data followed the Langmuir model. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据