4.7 Article

Acid transformation of bauxite residue: Conversion of its alkaline characteristics

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 324, 期 -, 页码 382-390

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.10.073

关键词

Bauxite residue; Alkaline transformation; Organic acid; Gypsum combination; NEXAFS analysis

资金

  1. Environmental Protection's Special Scientific Research for Chinese Public Welfare Industry [201509048]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41371475]
  3. Innovative Project of Independent Exploration for PhD of Central South University [2016zzts036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bauxite residue (BR) is a highly alkaline solid hazardous waste produced from bauxite processing for alumina production. Alkaline transformation appears to reduce the environmental risk of bauxite residue disposal areas (BRDAs) whilst potentially providing opportunities for the sustainable reuse and on-going management of BR. Mineral acids, a novel citric acid and a hybrid combination of acid-gypsum treatments were investigated for their potential to reduce residue pH and total alkalinity and transform the alkaline mineral phase. XRD results revealed that with the exception of andradite, the primary alkaline solid phases of cancrinite, grossular and calcite were transformed into discriminative products based on the transformation used. Supernatants separated from BR and transformed bauxite residue (TBR) displayed distinct changes in soluble Na, Ca and Al, and a reduction in pH and total alkalinity. SEM images suggest that mineral acid transformations promote macro-aggregate formation, and the positive promotion of citric acid, confirming the removal or reduction in soluble and exchangeable Na. NEXAFS analysis of Na K-edge revealed that the chemical speciation of Na in TBRs was consistent with BR. Three acid treatments and gypsum combination had no effect on Na speciation, which affects the distribution of Na revealed by sodium STXM imaging. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据