4.7 Article

Supercritical water oxidation of oil-based drill cuttings

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 332, 期 -, 页码 205-213

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.03.001

关键词

Organic solid waste; Supercritical water oxidation; Operating parameters; Reaction pathways

资金

  1. fundamental and frontier planning program of Chongqing [cstc2015jcyjA20010]
  2. science and technology planning program of Land Resource and House Management Office of Chongqing [CQGT-KJ-2014040]
  3. science and technology planning program of Fuling District, Chongqing [Y53Z230M10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oil-based drill cuttings(OBDC) are a typical hazardous solid waste that arises from drilling operations in oil and gas fields. The supercritical water oxidation(SCWO) of OBDC was comprehensively investigated in a batch reactor under the conditions of various oxygen coefficients (OC, 1.5-3.5), temperatures (T, 400-500 degrees C) and reaction times (t, 0.5-10 min). Preheating experiments indicated that most of the organic compounds in the initial OBDC sample were distributed within gaseous, oil, aqueous and solid phases, with no more than 9.8% of organic compounds converted into inorganic carbon. All tested variables, i.e., OC, T and t, positively affect the transformation of carbon compounds from the oil and solid phases to the aqueous phase and, ultimately, to CO2. Carbon monoxide is the primary stable intermediate. The total organic carbon (TOC) removal efficiency can reach up to 89.2% within 10 min at 500 degrees C. Analysis of the reaction pathways suggests both homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions exist in the reactor. The homogeneous reaction is a typical SCWO reaction that is governed by a free radical mechanism, and the heterogeneous reaction is dominated by mass transfer. The information obtained in this study is useful for further investigation and development of hydrothermal treatment procedures for OBDC. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据