4.5 Article

Serial-batching group scheduling with release times and the combined effects of deterioration and truncated job-dependent learning

期刊

JOURNAL OF GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION
卷 71, 期 1, 页码 147-163

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10898-017-0536-7

关键词

Scheduling; Serial-batching; Group scheduling; Release time; Deterioration; Truncated job-dependent learning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71501058, 71601065, 71231004, 71690235, 71690230, 71671055]
  2. Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [71521001]
  3. Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Chinese Ministry of Education [15YJC630097]
  4. Anhui Province Natural Science Foundation [1608085QG167]
  5. project of Distinguished International Professor by the Chinese Ministry of Education [MS2014HFGY026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates a single machine serial-batching scheduling problem considering release times, setup time, and group scheduling, with the combined effects of deterioration and truncated job-dependent learning. The objective of the studied problem is to minimize the makespan. Firstly, we analyze the special case where all groups have the same arrival time, and propose the optimal structural properties on jobs sequencing, jobs batching, batches sequencing, and groups sequencing. Next, the corresponding batching rule and algorithm are developed. Based on these properties and the scheduling algorithm, we develop a hybrid VNS-ASHLO algorithm incorporating variable neighborhood search (VNS) and adaptive simplified human learning optimization (ASHLO) algorithms to solve the general case of the studied problem. Computational experiments on randomly generated instances are conducted to compare the proposed VNS-ASHLO with the algorithms of VNS, ASHLO, Simulated Annealing (SA), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). The results based on instances of different scales show the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed algorithm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据