4.7 Article

Dynamic transcriptional symmetry-breaking in pre-implantation mammalian embryo development revealed by single-cell RNA-seq

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 142, 期 20, 页码 3468-3477

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.123950

关键词

Transcriptional symmetry-breaking; Pre-implantation embryo development; Lineage divergence; Monostable model; Bistable model

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB943000, 2011CB944401]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA01000000, XDA04020202-20]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81490741, 31200879, 31300957, 11401562]
  4. Fellowship of Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences [201306]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During mammalian pre-implantation embryo development, when the first asymmetry emerges and how it develops to direct distinct cell fates remain longstanding questions. Here, by analyzing single-blastomere transcriptome data from mouse and human pre-implantation embryos, we revealed that the initial blastomere-toblastomere biases emerge as early as the first embryonic cleavage division, following a binomial distribution pattern. The subsequent zygotic transcriptional activation further elevated overall blastomere-to-blastomere biases during the two-to 16-cell embryo stages. The trends of transcriptional asymmetry fell into two distinct patterns: for some genes, the extent of asymmetry was minimized between blastomeres (monostable pattern), whereas other genes, including those known to be lineage specifiers, showed ever-increasing asymmetry between blastomeres (bistable pattern), supposedly controlled by negative or positive feedbacks. Moreover, our analysis supports a scenario in which opposing lineage specifiers within an early blastomere constantly compete with each other based on their relative ratio, forming an inclined 'lineage strength' that pushes the blastomere onto a predisposed, yet flexible, lineage track before morphological distinction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据