4.4 Article

Quantifying ice cliff evolution with multi-temporal point clouds on the debris-covered Khumbu Glacier, Nepal

期刊

JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY
卷 63, 期 241, 页码 823-837

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jog.2017.47

关键词

debris-covered glaciers; glacial geomorphology; glaciological instruments and methods; remote sensing; supraglacial lakes

资金

  1. School of Geography at the University of Leeds
  2. Mount Everest Foundation
  3. British Society for Geomorphology
  4. Royal Geographical Society (IBG)
  5. Petzl Foundation
  6. water@leeds
  7. French Service d'Observation GLACIOCLIM
  8. French National Research Agency (ANR) [ANR-13-SENV-0005-04/05-PRESHINE]
  9. Labex OSUG@ (Investissements d'avenir) [ANR10 LABX56]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Measurements of glacier ice cliff evolution are sparse, but where they do exist, they indicate that such areas of exposed ice contribute a disproportionate amount of melt to the glacier ablation budget. We used Structure from Motion photogrammetry with Multi-View Stereo to derive 3-D point clouds for nine ice cliffs on Khumbu Glacier, Nepal (in November 2015, May 2016 and October 2016). By differencing these clouds, we could quantify the magnitude, seasonality and spatial variability of ice cliff retreat. Mean retreat rates of 0.30-1.49 cm d(-1) were observed during the winter interval (November 2015-May 2016) and 0.74-5.18 cm d(-1) were observed during the summer (May 2016-October 2016). Four ice cliffs, which all featured supraglacial ponds, persisted over the full study period. In contrast, ice cliffs without a pond or with a steep back-slope degraded over the same period. The rate of thermo-erosional undercutting was over double that of subaerial retreat. Overall, 3-D topographic differencing allowed an improved process-based understanding of cliff evolution and cliff-pond coupling, which will become increasingly important for monitoring and modelling the evolution of thinning debris-covered glaciers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据