4.6 Article

Hydrogeochemical characteristics of a volcanic-sedimentary aquifer with special emphasis on Fe and Mn content: A case study in Mexico

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION
卷 180, 期 -, 页码 113-126

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2017.06.002

关键词

Hydrochemistry; Volcanic-sedimentary aquifer; Redox conditions; Fe and Mn; Anthropogenic inputs

资金

  1. Autonomous University of the State of Mexico [2600/2008U]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies performed on the volcanic-sedimentary aquifer of the Tenancingo Valley (Mexico) reports high concentrations of Fe, Mn, and NO3-, and water from several wells receives purification treatments due to presence of Fe and Mn. These studies have not achieved conclusive results regarding the origin of Fe and Mn, nor have hydrogeochemical evaluations of the aquifer been performed. The present study aimed to evaluate the physicochemical characteristics of the water and identify the geochemical processes that determine presence of Fe and Mn in groundwater. This characterization was based on physicochemical data from well and spring samples (16 samples) during dry and rainy seasons (June and November 2012, respectively). The EC, temperature and pH ranged from 125 to 793 mu S cm(-1), 14.5 to 24.9 degrees C and 6.5 to 8.5 pH units, respectively. The Eh values ranged from - 219 to 327 my, indicating the existence of both reducing and oxidizing zones. Presence of Fe and Mn was detected in both springs and wells; concentrations were higher in well, exceeding 4 mg Fe L-1 and 0.5 mg Mn L-1. Content of Si ranged from 12 to 47 mg L-1. A model of the hydrogeochemical behavior of the aquifer was created to highlight the following: i) processes involved in water-rock interactions, including fluctuations in silicate levels that determine anionic and cationic content of water, and ii) redox reactions as the major control processes of Fe and Mn. Water quality for human use is restricted by Fe and Mn content and pH. For irrigation use, significant limitations were not presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据