4.7 Article

Development and function of human cerebral cortex neural networks from pluripotent stem cells in vitro

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 142, 期 18, 页码 3178-U152

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.123851

关键词

Cerebral cortex; Networks; Neural development; Stem cells; Human

资金

  1. Cambridge Wellcome Trust PhD programme in Developmental Biology [RG53710]
  2. Wellcome Trust [092096/Z/10/Z]
  3. Cancer Research UK [C6946/A14492]
  4. MRC [MR/L023784/1, MR/L023784/2] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A key aspect of nervous system development, including that of the cerebral cortex, is the formation of higher-order neural networks. Developing neural networks undergo several phases with distinct activity patterns in vivo, which are thought to prune and fine-tune network connectivity. We report here that human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)-derived cerebral cortex neurons form large-scale networks that reflect those found in the developing cerebral cortex in vivo. Synchronised oscillatory networks develop in a highly stereotyped pattern over several weeks in culture. An initial phase of increasing frequency of oscillations is followed by a phase of decreasing frequency, before giving rise to non-synchronous, ordered activity patterns. hPSC-derived cortical neural networks are excitatory, driven by activation of AMPA-and NMDA-type glutamate receptors, and can undergo NMDA-receptor-mediated plasticity. Investigating single neuron connectivity within PSC-derived cultures, using rabiesbased trans-synaptic tracing, we found two broad classes of neuronal connectivity: most neurons have small numbers (<10) of presynaptic inputs, whereas a small set of hub-like neurons have large numbers of synaptic connections (>40). These data demonstrate that the formation of hPSC-derived cortical networks mimics in vivo cortical network development and function, demonstrating the utility of in vitro systems for mechanistic studies of human forebrain neural network biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据