3.8 Proceedings Paper

Multi-Breath: Separate Respiration Monitoring for Multiple Persons with UWB Radar

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/COMPSAC.2019.00124

关键词

Respiration Rate Estimation; Apnea Detection; Multiple Persons; UWB Radar

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB004801]
  2. Shenzhen Basic Research Funding Scheme [JCYJ20170818104222072]
  3. NSFC [61572218]
  4. Alibaba Innovative Research (AIR) Program under H-ZG6G

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human respiration state is an important indicator to reflect health conditions. Recent advances in wireless human sensing have enabled device-free respiration monitoring using narrow-band wireless signals, which, however, fail to map the estimated respiration states to multiple persons. In this paper, we present Multi-Breath, a UWB-based system to achieve separate respiration monitoring for multiple persons. The UWB radar can accurately measure the travelling distance of the signals, which helps to separate the signals affected by different persons and map the detected respiration patterns to the corresponding persons with the location information. However, the radar signal time series of each person are quite noisy due to the multi-path effects caused by the respiration movements of other persons, making it difficult to accurately estimate the respiration state. To overcome this challenge, we propose to transform the UWB radar signal matrices of different persons as separate RGB images to reveal the respiration pattern of each individual. Then, the image processing operations, including image smoothing, edge detection, dilation and erosion, are applied to identify the breathing cycles. Finally, the respiration state, including the respiration rate and the presence of apnea, is estimated via blob detection and calibration. Extensive experiments show that the mean absolute error on respiration rate estimation is 0.3 - 0.6 bpm, and the percentage of missed and false detected apnea is 3% - 7%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据