3.8 Proceedings Paper

Long-tail Hashtag Recommendation for Micro-videos with Graph Convolutional Network

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3357384.3357912

关键词

Micro-videos; Hashtag Recommendation; Long-tail

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61772310, 61702300, 61702302, 61802231, U1836216]
  2. Project of Thousand Youth Talents 2016
  3. Shandong Provincial Natural Science and Foundation [ZR2019JQ23, ZR2019QF001]
  4. Future Talents Research Funds of Shandong University [2018WLJH 63]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hashtags, a user provides to a micro-video, are the ones which can well describe the semantics of the micro-video's content in his/her mind. At the same time, hashtags have been widely used to facilitate various micro-video retrieval scenarios (e.g., search, browse, and categorization). Despite their importance, numerous micro-videos lack hashtags or contain inaccurate or incomplete hashtags. In light of this, hashtag recommendation, which suggests a list of hashtags to a user when he/she wants to annotate a post, becomes a crucial research problem. However, little attention has been paid to micro-video hashtag recommendation, mainly due to the following three reasons: 1) lack of benchmark dataset; 2) the temporal and multi-modality characteristics of micro-videos; and 3) hashtag sparsity and long-tail distributions. In this paper, we recommend hashtags for micro-videos by presenting a novel multiview representation interactive embedding model with graph-based information propagation. It is capable of boosting the performance of micro-videos hashtag recommendation by jointly considering the sequential feature learning, the video-user-hashtag interaction, and the hashtag correlations. Extensive experiments on a constructed dataset demonstrate our proposed method outperforms state-ofthe-art baselines. As a side research contribution, we have released our dataset and codes to facilitate the research in this community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据