4.5 Article

Trust, Conflict, and Engagement in Occupational Health: North American Epidemiologists Conduct Occupational Study in Communities Affected by Chronic Kidney Disease of Unknown Origin (CKDu)

期刊

CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH REPORTS
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 247-255

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s40572-019-00244-6

关键词

CBPR; CKDu; Trust in science; Industry-funded research; Conflict of interest; Power dynamics

资金

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [R01ES027584]
  2. Azucareros del Istmo Centroamericano (AICA), an association of sugar producers in Central America
  3. JPB Environmental Health Fellowship from by the JPB Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of ReviewScience has been used as a tool of colonialism, and aspects of science privilege researchers in the global North (USA and Europe). The environmental justice and worker health movements in the USA and globally have influenced aspects of how occupational and environmental health research is conceived and conducted so that it is more equitable. This review provides a case example of research in the area of chronic kidney disease of unknown origin (CKDu).Recent FindingsIn the present work, the author describes aspects of community-based participatory research and anti-colonial research that influence a current occupational epidemiology study of CKDu in Mesoamerica among workers in agriculture and non-agricultural industries. The research includes investigators from numerous countries in the global North and South and funding from the US government and corporations.SummaryThe role of industry in science and the misuse of science by corporate interests remain substantial threats to research integrity. The ability of researchers to navigate potentially conflicting interests with industry and workers, and establish trust within and outside the scientific community, is essential for sustained engagement in longitudinal studies. Trust is about human relationships. It takes time and effort to build and is essential for creating equitable, empowering research relationships.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据