3.8 Proceedings Paper

Deep Reinforcement Active Learning for Human-In-The-Loop Person Re-Identification

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2019.00622

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61725202, 61829102, 61751212]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT19GJ201]
  3. Vision Semantics Limited
  4. China Scholarship Council
  5. Alan Turing Institute
  6. Innovate UK Industrial Challenge Project on Developing and Commercialising Intelligent Video Analytics Solutions for Public Safety [98111-571149]
  7. Australian Research Council [FL-170100117, DP-180103424]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most existing person re-identification(Re-ID) approaches achieve superior results based on the assumption that a large amount of pre-labelled data is usually available and can be put into training phrase all at once. However, this assumption is not applicable to most real-world deployment of the Re-ID task. In this work, we propose an alternative reinforcement learning based human-in-the-loop model which releases the restriction of pre-labelling and keeps model upgrading with progressively collected data. The goal is to minimize human annotation efforts while maximizing Re-ID performance. It works in an iteratively updating framework by refining the RL policy and CNN parameters alternately. In particular, we formulate a Deep Reinforcement Active Learning (DRAL) method to guide an agent (a model in a reinforcement learning process) in selecting training samples on-the-fly by a human user/annotator. The reinforcement learning reward is the uncertainty value of each human selected sample. A binary feedback (positive or negative) labelled by the human annotator is used to select the samples of which are used to fine-tune a pre-trained CNN Re-ID model. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of our DRAL method for deep reinforcement learning based human-in-the-loop person Re-ID when compared to existing unsupervised and transfer learning models as well as active learning models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据