4.6 Article

Identification and quantification of glucosinolates in different tissues of Raphanus raphanistrum by liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 20-27

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2016.06.002

关键词

Glucosinolates; Food analysis; Food composition; Mass spectrometry; MRM; PCA; Raphanus

资金

  1. P.O.R. SARDEGNA F.S.E.-Obiettivo competitivita regionale e occupazione
  2. Asse IV Capitale umano
  3. Linea di Attivita [1.3.1]
  4. Fondazione Banco di Sardegna
  5. Parco Nazionale Arcipelago di La Maddalena

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to identify and quantify the glucosinolates from different parts of wild radish R. raphanistrum (leaves, flowers, fruits, roots) using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Glucoraphenin is the predominant compound, accounting for about 87% (w/w) of total glucosinolate content, followed by glucobrassicin, glucoraphasatin and glucoraphanin (153 mg 100 g(-1),149 mg 100 g(-1) and 141 mg 100 g-1 FW, respectively) in fruits; followed by glucoraphasatin (3 mg 100 g(-1) FW) in flowers and by glucobrassicin, 4-hydroxyglucobrassicin and glucoraphasatin (145 mg 100 g(-1), 27 mg 100 g(-1) and 24 mg 100 g(-1) FW, respectively) in leaves. In roots the major glucosinolate is glucoraphasatin (56 mg 100 g(-1) FW) followed by the glucoraphenin and methoxyglucobrassicin (16 mg 100 g(-1) and 7 mg 100 g(-1) FW, respectively). Principal component analysis allowed the discrimination of fruit samples from other parts of the plant for the majority of glucosinolates and the fruits are highlighted as sources of glucosinolates. The results are interesting given that wild radish is one of the most important weeds of crops in the Mediterranean region and is popular for home vegetable production and for its employment in human nutrition both as a food as well as for medicinal purposes. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据