4.6 Article

Determination of fluoroquinolones in fishes using microwave-assisted extraction combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography and fluorescence detection

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 140-146

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2016.12.012

关键词

Food analysis; Food composition; Microwave-assisted extraction; Fluoroquinolones; Solid-phase extraction; Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography; UHPLC; MAE; SPE; Gilthead seabream; Fishes

资金

  1. European Social Fund
  2. state budget of the Czech Republic [CZ.1.07/2.3.00/ 30.0061]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CTM2015-66095-C2-1-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new analytical methodology based on ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (UHPLC-FD) has been developed for the determination of five fluoroquinolone antibiotics (FQs) used in aquaculture (norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, danofloxacin and sarafloxacin) in fish muscles (e.g. gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata)). The extraction and determination process was carried out by combining microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) along with a clean-up and pre-concentration step with solid phase extraction (SPE) followed by UHPLC-FD detection. The effects of different variables on MAE-SPE were studied and optimized using an experimental design. Validation was made in accordance with Decision 2002/657/EC. CC alpha and CC beta were determined according to the maximum residue limit (MRL). The method detection limit (MDL) of the entire process ranged between 0.1 and 6.0 ng g(-1). The recoveries obtained at two spiked concentrations levels (25 and 250 ng g(-1)) were greater than 90%, and the relative standard deviation was less than 8.7%. The developed methodology was successfully applied for the evaluation of the presence of FQs in fish muscle samples from aquaculture farms bought in various commercial shops in Gran Canaria Island (Spain). (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据