3.8 Proceedings Paper

High-Density ReRAM Crossbar with Selector Device for Sneak Path Reduction

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/icm48031.2019.9021944

关键词

ReRAM; Memristor; Sneak path; Selector

资金

  1. Khalifa University of Science and Technology under System on chip Centre [RC2-2018-020]
  2. United Arab Emirates Space Agency, Space Missions Science and Technology Directorate [K08-2016-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Memristive crossbar arrays are finding application in a wide range of operations such as memory, in-memory-computing, analog computing, etc. The crossbar performance is limited by a sneak path current, which limits the array size and negatively affects power and noise margin. In this paper, we present a synthesis of one selector and one Memristor device (1S1R) unit based on nonlinear resistive selector connected in series with bipolar Memristor (MR) element. The selector provides a gating function to the MR to reduce the sneak path current. The operation and performance of the MR and the selector devices have been verified individually and when serially connected. The MR cell measurements show good repeatability over multiple SET-RESET cycles with V-on similar to 2.5 to 3 V, R-off/R-on similar to 10(4) and V-off similar to -0.6 to -1.5 V. The electrical parameters of the memristor cell have been extracted and correlated mathematically using the Voltage-Threshold Adaptive Model (VTEAM). Various array sizes ranging from 2 x 2 to 4,000 x 4,000 have been investigated using spice circuit simulator. The results show that the proposed configuration reduces the sneak path by 200 times when compared with a similar size array that does not use a selector device. Also, using the selector increases the crossbar read margin, device selectivity, and enables high memory array density up to 4k x 4k compared to 512 x 512 state of the art. The device allows relatively low voltage operation of 4V/1V (write/read) compared to 5V/2V reported in literature, which makes it attractive for low power applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据