3.8 Proceedings Paper

Linear Discriminant Analysis with Bayesian Risk Parameters for Myoelectric Control

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/globalsip45357.2019.8969237

关键词

electromyography (EMG); pattern recognition; myoelectric control; linear discriminant analysis (LDA); Bayesian risk minimization; costs; priors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier remains a standard in myoelectric control due to its simplicity, ease of implementation, and robustness. Despite this, challenges associated with the temporal evolution of the myoelectric signal may require flexibility beyond the capabilities of standard LDA. Recently proposed approaches have leveraged more complex systems, such as adaptive window framing or temporal convolutional neural networks to incorporate temporal structure. In this work, we explore the potential of exploiting parameters inherent to the LDA, which is conventionally applied assuming static and equal prior probabilities and uniform cost functions, to improve myoelectric control. First, a cost -modified version of the LDA (cLDA) is introduced to better reflect the comparatively high cost of active errors. Second, an adaptive priors version of the LDA (pLDA) is introduced to reflect the changing prior probabilities of classes in the myoelectric signal time series. Results are compared against the standard LDA classifier using a novel dataset comprised of continuous class transitions. Although no significant differences were observed in total error, the proposed cLDA algorithm yielded significantly lower active error rates than the LDA alone. Furthermore, both the cLDA and pLDA classification schemes produced significantly lower instability than the LDA classifier alone, as measured by spurious changes in the output decision stream. This work lays the groundwork for future research on these flexible classification schemes including context dependent cost arrays, different methods of priors adaptation, and combinations of the proposed cLDA and pLDA frameworks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据