4.5 Article

Nonlinear aerodynamic and energy input properties of a twin-box girder bridge deck section

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES
卷 74, 期 -, 页码 413-426

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.06.016

关键词

Bridge; Non-linear; Aerodynamic; Indicial function; Hysteresis loop; Energy property

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By means of computational fluid dynamics (CFD), the nonlinear aeroelastic properties of a bridge deck configuration is investigated in this study in terms of amplitude-dependent flutter derivatives and indicial functions. The results are partially compared with experimental results. It shows that the concerned properties exhibit significant dependence on the motion amplitudes. Moreover, based on flutter derivatives, the nonlinear aerodynamic properties can be divided into two groups: the group with torsional amplitudes less or equal than 10 degrees, and the one with amplitudes larger than 10 degrees. Flow patterns around the section of the two groups differ substantially; one group remains an overall streamlined pattern with locally distributed vortices and detached flow, while the other shows fully detached flow with large vortices emerging and developing drastically. Dynamic load coefficients indicate that, as the motion amplitude increases, the smoothness of the hysteresis loops decreases, suggesting irregular fluctuations of the loads resulted from signature turbulence, which becomes progressively prominent. Energy trapping properties derived from indicial functions are expressed in terms of dimensionless coefficients, of which the results indicate there is no possibility of single-DOF flutter, and coupling between vertical and torsional motions is necessary for flutter instability. Moreover, by the analysis of the phase angles involved in coupling, it is indicated that symmetricity of vertical motion has to be consistent with that of torsional motion in the event of a coupled flutter. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据