3.8 Proceedings Paper

Agile Methods and Maturity Models Assessments: What's Next?

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-28005-5_48

关键词

Continuity of SPI programs; Abandonment of SPI programs; Agile methods

资金

  1. CNPQ (National Council of Scientific and Technological Development) [311176/2015-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The adoption of Software Process Improvement (SPI) initiatives, based on reference models, such as CMMI-DEV, is largely described in the literature. Challenges and benefits are already known, especially when these models are combined with agile methods. However, little is known on what happens after the appraisal. Do companies continue to use maturity models-based processes? Do they sacrifice agile practices? The objective of this study is thus to identify how software processes evolve in companies that use agile methods and have been assessed against maturity-based reference models. We performed a case study in four companies. Our results show that companies that use agile methods struggle to use, maintain and evolve their processes along with maturity models after the official assessment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据