4.7 Article

Androgen signaling negatively controls group 2 innate lymphoid cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 214, 期 6, 页码 1581-1592

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20161807

关键词

-

资金

  1. Conseil Regional Midi-Pyrenees
  2. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale [DEQ2000329169]
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia
  4. Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support
  5. Australian Government NHMRC Independent Medical Research Institutes Infrastructure Support Scheme
  6. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  7. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale
  8. Universite de Strasbourg
  9. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-10-1108-01 Androgluco, ANR-10-LABX-0030-INRT, ANR-10-IDEX-0002-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prevalence of asthma is higher in women than in men, but the mechanisms underlying this sex bias are unknown. Group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) are key regulators of type 2 inflammatory responses. Here, we show that ILC2 development is greatly influenced by male sex hormones. Male mice have reduced numbers of ILC2 progenitors (ILC2Ps) and mature ILC2s in peripheral tissues compared with females. In consequence, males exhibit reduced susceptibility to allergic airway inflammation in response to environmental allergens and less severe IL-33-driven lung inflammation, correlating with an impaired expansion of lung ILC2s. Importantly, orchiectomy, but not ovariectomy, abolishes the sex differences in ILC2 development and restores IL-33-mediated lung inflammation. ILC2Ps express the androgen receptor (AR), and AR signaling inhibits their differentiation into mature ILC2s. Finally, we show that hematopoietic AR expression limits IL-33-driven lung inflammation through a cell-intrinsic inhibition of ILC2 expansion. Thus, androgens play a crucial protective role in type 2 airway inflammation by negatively regulating ILC2 homeostasis, thereby limiting their capacity to expand locally in response to IL-33.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据