4.7 Article

Intestinal epithelial cell endoplasmic reticulum stress promotes MULT1 up-regulation and NKG2D-mediated inflammation

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 214, 期 10, 页码 2985-2997

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20162041

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK044319, DK051362, DK053056, DK088199, AI066897, AI068129, DK034854]
  2. Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America [3670]
  3. Instituto de Salud Carlos III from Spain [PI13/00218]
  4. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [825.13.012]
  5. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI) [2689323, 16K19162]
  6. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [KR 4749/1-1]
  7. Pediatric Scientist Development Program [K12-HD000850]
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K19162] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is commonly observed in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) and can, if excessive, cause spontaneous intestinal inflammation as shown by mice with IEC-specific deletion of X-box-binding protein 1 (Xbp1), an unfolded protein response-related transcription factor. In this study, Xbp1 deletion in the epithelium (Xbp1.IEC) is shown to cause increased expression of natural killer group 2 member D (NKG2D) ligand (NKG2DL) mouse UL16-binding protein (ULBP)-like transcript 1 and its human orthologue cytomegalovirus ULBP via ER stress-related transcription factor C/EBP homology protein. Increased NKG2DL expression on mouse IECs is associated with increased numbers of intraepithelial NKG2D-expressing group 1 innate lymphoid cells (ILCs; NK cells or ILC1). Blockade of NKG2D suppresses cytolysis against ER-stressed epithelial cells in vitro and spontaneous enteritis in vivo. Pharmacological depletion of NK1.1(+) cells also significantly improved enteritis, whereas enteritis was not ameliorated in Recombinase activating gene 1(-/-); Xbp1(Delta IEC) mice. These experiments reveal innate immune sensing of ER stress in IECs as an important mechanism of intestinal inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据