4.7 Article

Spatially resolved metabolic analysis reveals a central role for transcriptional control in carbon allocation to wood

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 68, 期 13, 页码 3529-3539

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erx200

关键词

Aspen; Populus; primary metabolism; wood formation

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council FORMAS Bioimprove program
  2. UPSC Berzelii Centre for Forest Biotechnology - VINNOVA, the Swedish Research Council
  3. Bio4Energy
  4. Swedish programme for renewable energy
  5. Max Planck Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The contribution of transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation to modifying carbon allocation to developing wood of trees is not well defined. To clarify the role of transcriptional regulation, the enzyme activity patterns of eight central primary metabolism enzymes across phloem, cambium, and developing wood of aspen (Populus tremula L.) were compared with transcript levels obtained by RNA sequencing of sequential stem sections from the same trees. Enzymes were selected on the basis of their importance in sugar metabolism and in linking primary metabolism to lignin biosynthesis. Existing enzyme assays were adapted to allow measurements from similar to 1 mm(3) sections of dissected stem tissue. These experiments provided high spatial resolution of enzyme activity changes across different stages of wood development, and identified the gene transcripts probably responsible for these changes. In most cases, there was a clear positive relationship between transcripts and enzyme activity. During secondary cell wall formation, the increases in transcript levels and enzyme activities also matched with increased levels of glucose, fructose, hexose phosphates, and UDP-glucose, emphasizing an important role for transcriptional regulation in carbon allocation to developing aspen wood. These observations corroborate the efforts to increase carbon allocation to wood by engineering gene regulatory networks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据