3.8 Proceedings Paper

Reliability-driven Task Assignment in Vehicular Crowdsourcing: A Matching Game

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/DSN-W.2019.00023

关键词

Vehicular crowdsourcing; reliability assessment; task assignment; matching game; Gale/Shapley algorithm

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canada Research Chairs (CRC) program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vehicular crowdsourcing is an emerging mobile sensing-based paradigm in which a service platform manages the allocation of data collection and processing tasks to vehicles according to their itinerary, expected response time, and optimal reward. However, selfish or malicious vehicles may take advantage of the platform to maximize their profit or even attack the deployed sensing applications and compromise their decisions by transmitting unreliable data, which can degrade the quality of delivered services and negatively affect the platform reward and reputation. In this paper, we design a task assignment mechanism for vehicular crowdsourcing based on vehicles' reliability to protect the platform from such threats. First, a beta reputation system is adopted for probabilistic reliability assessment according to vehicles' behavior. Then, a new multi-dimensional task assignment problem, which proves to be NP-complete, is modeled as a many-to-one matching game between the platform and vehicles by defining reliability and reward-based preference functions. Finally, a distributed matching algorithm that aims at maximizing the platform reward by assigning the tasks to reliable participants is presented. The mechanism also achieves privacy-preservability by enabling vehicles to engage in the task allocation process without necessarily unveiling their sensitive information. Results show that the proposed mechanism increases the quality of crowdsourcing services by assigning the tasks to reliable and benign vehicles, and adheres to the scalability requirements of the system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据