4.7 Review

Seed dormancy cycling and the regulation of dormancy mechanisms to time germination in variable field environments

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 68, 期 4, 页码 843-856

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erw477

关键词

Annual life cycle; Arabidopsis; DOG1; dormancy cycling; germination; nitrate signalling; PHYA; seed dormancy

资金

  1. UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [IF0116]
  2. BBSRC [BB/1022201/1]
  3. EU (FP7 grant) [311840 EcoSeed]
  4. BBSRC [BB/I022201/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I022201/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many molecular mechanisms that regulate dormancy have been identified individually in controlled laboratory studies. However, little is known about how the seed employs this complex suite of mechanisms during dormancy cycling in the variable environment of the soil seed bank. Nevertheless, this behaviour is essential to ensure germination takes place in a favourable habitat and climate space, and in the correct season for the resulting plant to complete its life cycle. During their time in the soil seed bank, seeds continually adjust their dormancy status by sensing a range of environmental signals. Those related to slow seasonal change (e.g. temperature) are used for temporal sensing to determine the time of year and depth of dormancy. This alters their sensitivity to signals related to their spatial environment (e.g. light, nitrate, and water potential) that indicate that conditions are suitable for germination, and so trigger the termination of dormancy. We review work on the physiological, molecular, and ecological aspects of seed dormancy in Arabidopsis and interpret it in the context of dormancy cycling in the soil seed bank. This approach has provided new insight into the co-ordination of mechanisms and signalling networks, and the multidimensional sensing that regulates dormancy cycling in a variable environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据