3.8 Proceedings Paper

Somatosensory Cortex Microstimulation: Behavioral Effects of Phase Duration and Asymmetric Waveforms

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2019.8856579

关键词

Intracortical Microstimulation; Stimulation Parameters; Pulse Width; Neuromodulation; Neuroprostheses

资金

  1. NIH [NIH-U01NS099700, NIH1OT2OD023861-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intracortical microstimulation has proven to be effective in a variety of sensory applications, such as returning touch percepts to paralyzed patients. The parameters of microstimulation play an important role in the perception quality of the stimulus. Eliciting naturalistic percepts is essential for the adaptability and functionality of this technology. Compared to the typical biphasic symmetric waveforms, asymmetric waveforms enhance activation selectivity by preferentially activating cell bodies. Behavioral studies have shown that asymmetric waveforms can elicit behavioral responses, but these require higher charges than typical symmetric waveforms. Here, we investigated the effects of phase duration and waveform asymmetry for somatosensory cortex intracortical microstimulation of freely-behaving rats. Detection thresholds were obtained using a conditioned avoidance behavioral paradigm. Our results indicate that phase duration has significant effects on threshold regardless of symmetry, polarity, and phase order of the waveform. Specifically, shorter phase durations tend to elicit lower behavioral thresholds. Analogous to studies in the auditory cortex, asymmetric waveforms in which the short pulse was cathodic were more effective than those with short-anodic pulses. With short phase durations, these short-cathodic waveforms are capable of evoking behavioral responses at low charges (<5 nC/Phase). Altogether, these results suggest the possibility of cell body selective microstimulation at safe thresholds, as well as the potential translatability of neuromodulation parameters across distinct sensory cortical areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据