4.5 Article

Strong association between corticosterone levels and temperature-dependent metabolic rate in individual zebra finches

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 220, 期 23, 页码 4426-4431

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.166124

关键词

Corticosterone; Taeniopygia guttata; Glucocorticoid; Metabolic rate

类别

资金

  1. University of Groningen (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen)
  2. Max Planck Institute for Ornithology (Max-Planck-Gesellschaft)
  3. Max Planck Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucocorticoid hormones (GCs) are often assumed to be indicators of stress. At the same time, one of their fundamental roles is to facilitate metabolic processes to accommodate changes in energetic demands. Although the metabolic function of GCs is thought to be ubiquitous across vertebrates, we are not aware of experiments which tested this directly, i.e. in which metabolic rate was manipulated and measured together with GCs. We therefore tested for a relationship between plasma corticosterone (CORT; ln transformed) andmetabolic rate (MR; measured using indirect calorimetry) in a between- and within-individual design in captive zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) of both sexes. In each individual, CORT and MR were measured at two different temperature levels: 'warm' (22 degrees C) and 'cold' (12 degrees C). CORT and MR were both increased in colder compared with warmer conditions within individuals, but also across individuals. At the between- individual level, we found a positive relationship between CORT and MR, with an accelerating slope towards higher MR and CORT values. In contrast, the within-individual changes in CORT and MR in response to colder conditions were linearly correlated between individuals. The CORT-MR relationship did not differ between the sexes. Our results illustrate the importance of including variation at different levels to better understand physiological modulation. Furthermore, our findings support the interpretation of CORT variation as an indicator of metabolic needs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据