3.8 Proceedings Paper

Offline Signature Verification using Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Architectures GoogLeNet Inception-v1 and Inception-v3

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.147

关键词

Convolutional Neural Networks; CNN; GPDS Synthetic Signature Database; Inception-v1; Inception-v3; GoogLeNet

资金

  1. Ministry of Education (MOE) [R.K130000.7740.4J283]
  2. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia [R.K130000.7740.4J283]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biometric systems such as signature verification are highly viable in order to identify individuals in organizations or in finance divisions. Advancement in classification of images using deep learning networks has opened an opportunity for this problem. In this study, the largest available handwritten signature dataset, namely, the GPDS Synthetic Signature Database, was employed for the classification of signatures of 1000 users, each of which having 24 original (or genuine) signatures, and 30 forged (or fake) signatures. Moreover, two popular GoogLeNet architecture versions of CNN, namely, Inception-v1 and Inception-v3, were used. Firstly, algorithms were trained on samples from 20 users, and achieved a validation accuracy of 83% for Inception-vl and 75% for Inception-v3. In teiins of Equal Error Rates (EER), Inception-vl managed to obtain an EER as low as 17 for 20 users; while EER for Inception-v3 with 20 users obtained 24, which is a good measure compared to prior works in the literature. Although Inception-v3 has perfolined better in the ImageNet image classification challenge, in the case of 2D images of signatures, Inception-v1 has performed the classification task better than Inception-v3 It is also acknowledged in this study that Inception-vl spent less time training, as it had a lower number of operations compared to Inception-v3. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据