3.8 Proceedings Paper

Automated Course Timetabling Optimization Using Tabu-Variable Neighborhood Search Based Hyper-Heuristic Algorithm

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.169

关键词

Course Timetabling; Variable Neighborhood Search Algorithm; Tabu Search Algorithm; Hyper-Heuristic Algorithm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Course timetabling problems are challenging, laborious and repetitive work in the universities. However, in many universities this repetitive works was still carried out manually. It is because there are so many constraints that must be considered either from the students and lecturers' requirement or the infrastructure such as room availability. Therefore, to automate the process of timetabling is hard problem. Scientifically, in the literature, course timetabling optimization is one of non-deterministic polynomial problems, usually abbreviated as NP-hard problem. For NP-hard problem, there is not any exact algorithm known could solve the problem within polynomial-time. The state-of-the-art methods for solving the problem are approximation algorithms that are mainly meta-heuristics. This paper presents a new approach, namely, hyper-heuristics as opposed to meta-heuristics, to cope with the need of intensive problem specific parameter tuning in meta-heuristics approach. The algorithms employed within hyper-heuristic approach presented in this paper are tabu search hybridize with variable neighborhood search. Tested over two real-world course timetabling problem datasets, the computational results from the experiments showed that the proposed algorithm could automate the process of timetabling. Furthermore, compared to the timetable produced manually, in term of soft constraint violation penalties, the proposed algorithm could improve by 1855 and 1110 respectively. In addition to new approach, the main contribution of this paper is two real-world course timetabling problems available for public to encourage further research as future works. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据