4.1 Article

Molecular Phylogeny and Surface Morphology of Thiriotia hyperdolphinae n. sp and Cephaloidophora oradareae n. sp (Gregarinasina, Apicomplexa) Isolated from a Deep Sea Oradarea sp (Amphipoda) in the West Pacific

期刊

JOURNAL OF EUKARYOTIC MICROBIOLOGY
卷 65, 期 3, 页码 372-381

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jeu.12480

关键词

18S rDNA; Cephaloidophoridae; Crustacea; marine gregarines; microscopy; Thiriotidae

资金

  1. Office of International Affairs at Hokkaido University
  2. Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science [26840133]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In an effort to broaden our understanding of the biodiversity and distribution of gregarines infecting crustaceans, this study describes two new species of gregarines, Thiriotia hyperdolphinae n. sp. and Cephaloidophora oradareae n. sp., parasitizing a deep sea amphipod (Oradarea sp.). Amphipods were collected using the ROV Hyper-Dolphin at a depth of 855 m while on a cruise in Sagami Bay, Japan. Gregarine trophozoites and gamonts were isolated from the gut of the amphipod and studied with light and scanning electron microscopy, and phylogenetic analysis of 18S rDNA. Thiriotia hyperdolphinae n. sp. was distinguished from existing species based on morphology, phylogenetic position, as well as host niche and geographic locality. Cephaloidophora oradareae n. sp. distinguished itself from existing Cephaloidophora, based on a difference in host (Oradarea sp.), geographic location, and to a certain extent morphology. We established this latter new species with the understanding that a more comprehensive examination of diversity at the molecular level is necessary within Cephaloidophora. Results from the 18S rDNA molecular phylogeny showed that T. hyperdolphinae n. sp. was positioned within a clade consisting of Thiriotia spp., while C. oradareae n. sp. grouped within the Cephaloidophoridae. Still, supplemental genetic information from gregarines infecting crustaceans will be needed to better understand relationships within this group of apicomplexans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据