期刊
TRANSFORMING LEARNING WITH MEANINGFUL TECHNOLOGIES, EC-TEL 2019
卷 11722, 期 -, 页码 577-581出版社
SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7_43
关键词
Feedback; Writing analytics; Keystroke analysis; Revision; Automated writing evaluation
Automated writing evaluation tools have been shown to improve writing quality. However, the impact of automated feedback, and especially the timing of the feedback, on students' writing process is still unknown. Hence, we analyzed how feedback timing influences the revision process. Three experimental conditions were implemented into the writing tool CyWrite: no feedback, immediate feedback during the drafting and revision stage, and feedback during the revision stage only. Keystroke data were collected from 60 ESL students while conducting a source-based argumentative writing task. The revisions made during the writing process and the students' satisfaction with the system were analyzed. The results showed little differences in the amount, size, and duration of revisions between the three conditions. However, students reported they felt more disrupted when feedback was provided during the full writing process rather than in the revision stage only.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据