3.8 Proceedings Paper

Continuous Direct Sparse Visual Odometry from RGB-D Images

期刊

ROBOTICS: SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS XV
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

MIT PRESS

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Toyota Research Institute (TRI) [N021515]
  2. TRI
  3. NSF [1808051, DMS 1613819]
  4. AFSOR [FA9550-18-10028]
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys [1808051] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports on a novel formulation and evaluation of visual odometry from RGB-D images. Assuming a static scene, the developed theoretical framework generalizes the widely used direct energy formulation (photometric error minimization) technique for obtaining a rigid body transformation that aligns two overlapping RGB-D images to a continuous formulation. The continuity is achieved through functional treatment of the problem and representing the process models over RGB-D images in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space; consequently, the registration is not limited to the specific image resolution and the framework is fully analytical with a closed-form derivation of the gradient. We solve the problem by maximizing the inner product between two functions defined over RGB-D images, while the continuous action of the rigid body motion Lie group is captured through the integration of the flow in the corresponding Lie algebra. Energy-based approaches have been extremely successful and the developed framework in this paper shares many of their desired properties such as the parallel structure on both CPUs and GPUs, sparsity, semi-dense tracking, avoiding explicit data association which is computationally expensive, and possible extensions to the simultaneous localization and mapping frameworks. The evaluations on experimental data and comparison with the equivalent energy-based formulation of the problem confirm the effectiveness of the proposed technique, especially, when the lack of structure and texture in the environment is evident.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据