4.2 Article

High-throughput metagenomic analysis of petroleum-contaminated soil microbiome reveals the versatility in xenobiotic aromatics metabolism

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 25-35

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2016.08.022

关键词

Comparative genomics; Metagenomic sequencing; Taxonomic analysis; Oil-contaminated soils

资金

  1. National High-tech R&D Program of China [2014AA021302, 2014AA021303]
  2. Tianjin Basic Research and Frontier Technology Program [13JCYBJC39500]
  3. Key Technologies Research and Development Program of Tianjin [11ZCZDSY08400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The soil with petroleum contamination is one of the most studied soil ecosystems due to its rich microorganisms for hydrocarbon degradation and broad applications in bioremediation. However, our understanding of the genomic properties and functional traits of the soil microbiome is limited. In this study, we used high-throughput metagenomic sequencing to comprehensively study the microbial community from petroleum-contaminated soils near Tianjin Dagang oilfield in eastern China. The analysis reveals that the soil metagenome is characterized by high level of community diversity andmetabolic versatility. Themetageome community is predominated by gamma-Proteobacteria and alpha-Proteobacteria, which are key players for petroleumhydrocarbon degradation. The functional study demonstrates over-represented enzyme groups and pathways involved in degradation of a broad set of xenobiotic aromatic compounds, including toluene, xylene, chlorobenzoate, aminobenzoate, DDT, methylnaphthalene, and bisphenol. A composite metabolic network is proposed for the identified pathways, thus consolidating our identification of the pathways. The overall data demonstrated the great potential of the studied soil microbiome in the xenobiotic aromatics degradation. The results not only establish a rich reservoir for novel enzyme discovery but also provide putative applications in bioremediation. (C) 2016 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据