3.8 Proceedings Paper

A Preliminary Study of UG2AG Link Quality in LoRa-based Wireless Underground Sensor Networks

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/lcn44214.2019.8990756

关键词

WUSNs; LPWANs; LoRa; UG2AG Link Quality; Challenging medium

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0603100]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [51507112]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [0250219107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A reliable communication channel between the underground sensor nodes and aboveground devices is vital and mostly desirable for data collection, relay and upload for the wireless underground sensor networks (WUSNs). In particular, the analysis of the underground-to-aboveground (UG2AG) link quality is crucial for the practical realization and deployment of WUSNs. Recently, LoRa, as one of the low-power wide-area networks (LPWANs) technologies, has attracted substantial attentions for its unique advantages such as the low power consumption and long-range capability. However, to the best of our knowledge, its performance has not yet been quantitatively analyzed for LoRa-based WUSNs. In this paper, a preliminary evaluation of the LoRa's capability of serving a UG2AG channel are presented at various burial depths in two challenging media, i.e., attenuative soils and water. We experimentally analyze the influence of various physical layer (PHY) parameters, e.g., spreading factor (SF), bandwidth (BW), and coding rate (CR) on the LoRa's propagation performance in the field. The results reveal that the reliable UG2AG communication link (without packet loss) can be established at an internode distance greater than 50m when the LoRa device is buried 0.4m deep, even in soils with relatively high volumetric water content (VWC). Our field results successfully verify the theoretical model for the UG2AG channel. These results may have a significant impact on the deployment of LoRa-based WUSNs with the potential applications in underground utilities monitoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据