4.7 Article

Influence of ozonation and biodegradation on toxicity of industrial textile wastewater

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 195, 期 -, 页码 166-173

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.06.055

关键词

Toxicity; Microtox (R); Biodegradation; Ozonation; Textile wastewater

资金

  1. National Centre for Research and Development (NCBiR) in Poland [PBS2/A9/22/2013]
  2. Foundation for Polish Science within the START

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The textile industry demands huge volumes of high quality water which converts into wastewater contaminated by wide spectrum of chemicals. Estimation of textile wastewater influence on the aquatic systems is a very important issue. Therefore, closing of the water cycle within the factories is a promising method of decreasing its environmental impact as well as operational costs. Taking both reasons into account, the aim of this work was to establish the acute toxicity of the textile wastewater before and after separate chemical, biological as well as combined chemical-biological treatment. For the first time the effects of three different combinations of chemical and biological methods were investigated. The acute toxicity analysis were evaluated using the Microtox (R) toxicity test. Ozonation in two reactors of working volume 1 dm(3) (stirred cell) and 20 dm(3) (bubble column) were tested as chemical process, while biodegradation was conducted in two, different systems-Sequence Batch Reactors (SBR; working volume 1.5 dm(3)) and Horizontal Continuous Flow Bioreactor (HCFB; working volume 12 dm(3)). The untreated wastewater had the highest toxicity (EC50 value in range: 3-6%). Ozonation caused lower reduction of the toxicity than biodegradation. In the system with SBR the best results were obtained for the biodegradation followed by the ozonation and additional biodegradation-96% of the toxicity removal. In the second system (with HCFB) two-stage treatment (biodegradation followed by the ozonation) led to the highest toxicity reduction (98%). (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据