4.7 Article

Hydrothermal co-carbonization of sewage sludge and pinewood sawdust for nutrient-rich hydrochar production: Synergistic effects and products characterization

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 52-62

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.018

关键词

Hydrothermal carbonization; Biomass; Different mixing ratio; Synergism; Nutrient elements

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT16-LAB04]
  2. Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology [HC201321]
  3. Liaoning Natural Science Foundation [201602182]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51208075]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study is to explore the synergistic effects of hydrothermal co-carbonization of sewage sludge and pinewood sawdust on hydrochar production. Firstly, the effects of mixing ratios on hydro thermal carbonization were investigated, and then, the hydrochar was characterized by diverse analytical techniques. The mass balance results indicated that a significant synergistic enhancement occurred in terms of the increased hydrochar yield, organic and carbon retentions. By combining sewage sludge and pinewood sawdust at the mass ratio of 1:1, 58.11 +/- 0.91% of hydrochar yield was obtained with high synergistic coefficients (8.41% for hydrochar yield, 13.09% for carbon retention, and 14.92% for organics retention). The hydrochar properties of nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, and surface functional groups were improved by hydrothermal co-carbonization approach. The FT-IR spectra, CP-MAS C-13 NMR and SEM results further indicated that hydrothermal co-carbonization promoted the development of aromaticity and surface structure. Our findings suggested that hydrothermal co-carbonization is a promising strategy to tailor high-performance hydrochar for different applications. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据