4.7 Article

Removal of antibiotic sulfamethoxazole by zero-valent iron under oxic and anoxic conditions: Removal mechanisms in acidic, neutral and alkaline solutions

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 200, 期 -, 页码 88-96

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.065

关键词

Antibiotic sulfamethoxazole; Zero-valent iron; Degradation; Adsorption; Solution pH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Removal of antibiotic sulfamethoxazole (SMX) by zero-valent iron (ZVI) was examined in the range of pH from 3.0 to 11.0 under oxic and anoxic conditions to clarify mechanisms of SMX removal in acidic, neutral and alkaline solutions. SMX removal was affected by solution pH and related to the speciation of SMX. Under the oxic condition, the maximums of SMX removal efficiency and rate were obtained at pH 3.0. The SMX removal efficiency decreased from 100 to 32% with increasing pH in the acidic solutions (3 pH 5) and increased to 88% in neutral and moderately alkaline solutions (6 <= pH <= 10). In highly alkaline solution (pH = 11), the SMX removal was significantly suppressed due to the formation of passive layer on ZVI surface. The removal rate of SMX under the oxic condition significantly declined with increasing pH. Under the anoxic condition, SMX removal was completed within 300 min in the acidic solutions and remained to less than 70% after 300 min in neutral and moderately alkaline solutions. For pH 10, no SMX removal practically occurred. The removal rate of SMX under the anoxic condition approximately remained constant in the acidic solution and largely decreased in neutral and moderately alkaline solutions. SMX removal by ZVI was found to be dominated by the reductive degradation and adsorption under both the oxic and anoxic conditions. It was concluded that ZVI has the potential for effective removal of antibiotic SMX under the oxic and anoxic conditions. A kinetic model could reasonably simulate the dynamic profiles of SMX removal. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据