3.9 Article

Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus cells against specific and native fish spoilage bacteria and their spoilage indices on Asian seabass fish chunks

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 38, 期 5, 页码 841-847

出版社

TRIVENI ENTERPRISES
DOI: 10.22438/jeb/38/5/MS-235

关键词

Antagonism; Fish-borne bacteria; Lb. rhamnosus; Seabass fish; Spoilage bacteria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim : The present study aimed at evaluating probiotic bacterial cells, Lb. rhamnosus by coating on seabass fish meat chunks against its spoilage indices,native and specific fish spoilage bacteria. Methodology : Seabass fish fillets were cut into chunks, washed and taken into petri plates. Scores were made using sterile blade. Lb. rhamnosus cells were coated on the chunks using micro pipette and tested for antagonism against fish borne specific spoilage bacteria such as Shewanella putrefaciens and Pseudomonas fluorescens through 'Deferred antagonism assay. Spent culture of Lb. rhamnosus was assayed for antagonism through Agar-well diffusion assay. The changes were estimated for two days following Conway micro diffusion method. Results : Lb. rhamnosus cells when co-cultured with P fluorescens were inhibited on the second day by 1.0 log difference as compared with control. The spent culture of Lb.rhamnosus, after treating at 121 C for 10 min showed inhibition against P fluorescens. But the spent culture after treatment at 100C showed difference of inhibitory zone at 5.0 mm against S. putrefaciens. Lb. rhamnosus cells when coated on seabass fish meat chunks, the native proteolytic bacteria was inhibited by Lb. rhamnosus on 311 1day by 1.3 log difference as compared to control. Lb. rhamnosus cell coat, reduced fish spoilage indices such as TrimethylamineNitrogen (TMA-N) and Total volatile bases- Nitrogen (TVB-N) by 80 mg% difference. Interpretation : The study concluded that coating of probiotic Lb. rhamnosus cells on fish meat would contribute antagonism and regulate the growth of specific and native spoilage bacteria with spoilage indices. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据