4.5 Article

Interactions between the Tetrasodium Salts of EDTA and 1-Hydroxyethane 1,1-Diphosphonic Acid with Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigants

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
卷 43, 期 4, 页码 657-661

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.006

关键词

EDTA; etidronate; HEBP; HEDP; NaOCI; sodium hypochlorite

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: A clinically useful all-in-one endodontic irrigant with combined proteolytic and decalcifying properties is still elusive. In this study, the chemical effects of dissolving the tetrasodium salts of 1-hydroxyethane 1,1-diphosphonic acid (Na4HEDP) or Na(4)EDTA directly in sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) irrigants in polypropylene syringes were assessed during the course of 1 hour. Methods: The solubility of the salts in water was determined. Their compatibility with 1% and 5% NaOCl was measured by iodometric titration and in a calcium complexation experiment by using a Ca2+-selective electrode. Results: The salts dissolved within 1 minute. The dissolution maximum of Na4HEDP in water (wt/total wt) was 44.6% 1.6%. The corresponding dissolution maximum of Na(4)EDTA was 38.2% 0.8%. Na4HEDP at 18% in 5% NaOCl caused a mere loss of 16% of the initially available chlorine during 1 hour. In contrast, a corresponding mixture between NaOCl and the Na(4)EDTA salt caused 95% reduction in available chlorine after 1 minute. Mixtures of 3% Na(4)EDTA with 1% NaOCl were more stable, but only for 30 minutes. Na4HEDP lost 24% of its calcium complexation capacity after 60 minutes. The corresponding loss for Na(4)EDTA was 34%. Conclusions: The compatibility and solubility of particulate Na4HEDP with/in NaOCl solutions are such that these components can be mixed and used for up to 1 hour. In contrast, short-term compatibility of the Na(4)EDTA salt with NaOCl solutions was considerably lower, decreasing at higher concentrations of either compound. Especially for Na4HEDP but also for Na(4)EDTA, the NaOCl had little effect on calcium complexation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据