4.5 Article

Bisphenol A promotes hepatic lipid deposition involving Kupffer cells M1 polarization in male mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 234, 期 2, 页码 143-154

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/JOE-17-0028

关键词

Kupffer cell; bisphenol A; polarization; NAFLD; inflammation

资金

  1. National Key Clinical Specialties Construction Program of China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81370954, 81270947, 81570763]
  3. Fundamental Science & Advanced Technology Research of Chongqing (Major Project, CSTC) [2015jcyjB0111]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bisphenol A (BPA), one of the most common environmental endocrine disruptors, is considered to promote hepatic lipid deposition. However, the mechanism has not been fully elucidated. The polarization of Kupffer cells (KCs) plays an important role in hepatic inflammation by promoting pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype (M1KCs), which contributes to dysregulated lipid metabolism. The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of KC polarization in BPA-induced hepatosteatosis in male mice. In this study, we examined hepatic lipid contents and quantified M1KC in BPA-treated CD1 mice, and further explored the interaction between KCs and hepatocytes using conditional HepG2 cell culture. BPA treatment significantly increased hepatic fat contents in CD1 mice, accompanied by increased number of pro-inflammatory M1KCs and enhanced secretion of inflammatory cytokines. Increased lipid contents were also observed in HepG2 cells treated with BPA. Interestingly, higher TG contents were observed in HepaG2 cells treated with conditional media from BPA-treated KCs, compared with those treated with BPA directly. Incubation of KCs with BPA promoted the polarization of KCs to pro-inflammatory M1 dominant subtypes, which was blocked by estrogen antagonist ICI182780. Taken together, our results revealed that M1KCs polarization is involved in BPA-induced hepatic fat deposition, which is possibly associated with the estrogen receptor signaling pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据