期刊
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 442-461出版社
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2019.1583397
关键词
Case survey; collaborative conservation; logic chain; measures; variables
资金
- German Research Foundation (DFG) [NE 1207/2-1]
- European Research Council (ERC) [263859]
- European Research Council (ERC) [263859] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
Much existing research on collaborative conservation has focused on process, even as researchers have called for greater attention to explaining what results these processes yield. It is time to take stock of collaborative conservation research by mapping what kinds of variables researchers are including in analyses. Here we conduct a case survey from the SCAPE database of environmental decision-making cases. We include cases involving collaboration across government, environmental protection, and resource exploitation interests in western democratic countries. Results reveal patterns in what researchers include in their outputs, outcomes, and impacts measures of collaborative conservation. While there is little difference by publication type (peer-reviewed journals, scholarly book chapters, or gray literature) or over time, we find significant differences in explicit measures across variable types. In particular, variables more proximate to process in a logic chain are more often measured, as are social rather than ecological variables.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据