4.7 Article

Imipramine sensing in pharmaceutical formulations using boron-doped diamond electrode

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 788, 期 -, 页码 118-124

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.01.067

关键词

Imipramine; Boron-doped diamond electrode; Square-wave voltammetry

资金

  1. CNPq-INCT [573925/2008-9, 573548/2008-0]
  2. CAPES [23038.007973/2012-90, Acordo Funcap - 2133/2012/Processo]
  3. Pedro de Lima-Neto [302801/2014-6]
  4. Adriana Nunes Correia [400223/2014-7, 303596/2014-7]
  5. CNPq
  6. CNPq-PVE
  7. CAPES-PNPD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes the development of an electroanalytical procedure proposal for the determination of tricyclic antidepressant imipramine (IMP) in commercial pharmaceutical formulations using boron-doped diamond electrode and square-wave voltammetry. The electrochemical oxidation of imipramine was studied in 0.04 mol L-1 Britton-Robinson buffer solution. The voltammetric results showed two well-defined oxidation peaks with potentials of 0.04 V and 0.82 V vs. Ag/AgCl/3 mol L-1 Cl- for peaks 1 and 2, respectively. The effect of the experimental and voltammetric parameters was evaluated and the best performance was obtained in pH 7.4, pulses application frequency of potential of 100 Hz, amplitude of 50 mV and potential increment of 2 my. Under these conditions, the analytical curves were obtained in the linear range of concentration from 1.73 x 10(-7) mol L-1 to 2.53 x 10(-6) mol L-1 (r = 0.9984), with detection and quantitation limits 435 x 10(-8) mol L-1 and 1.45 x 10(-7) mol L-1, respectively. The proposed method was applied with success in the determination of IMP in commercial pharmaceutical formulations and validated by comparison with standard method for determination of imipramine. The obtained results were in close agreement, at a 95% confidence level, with those obtained using an official method of the British Pharmacopeia. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据