4.7 Article

Modification of glassy carbon electrode with iron-terpyridine complex and iron-terpyridine complex covalently bonded to ordered mesoporous carbon substrate: Preparation, electrochemistry and application to H2O2 determination

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 789, 期 -, 页码 92-99

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.01.043

关键词

Ordered mesoporous carbon; Diazonium salt; Covalent attachment; Terpyridine complexes; Hydrogen peroxide

资金

  1. Research Council of the University of Isfahan
  2. Iranian Nanotechnology Initiative Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, simple strategies for the modification of glassy carbon electrode (GCE) with iron-4 ''(phenyl)-2, 2 '':6 '', 2 ''-terpyridine complex (Fe-PTPY) and Fe-PTPY covalently bonded to ordered mesoporous carbon (OMC) are described. The Fe-PTPY/OMC modified GCE (Fe-PIPY/OMC/GCE) was prepared in a three steps strategy. In the first step, OMC modified GCE was prepared by simple casting. Then, PTPY ligand was attached directly to the electrode surface through electrochemical reduction of 4'(4aminophenyl)-2,2':6', 2 ''-terpyridine (APTPY) diazonium salt. The modification was completed by iron attachment to the electrode surface through complex formation reaction with surface PTPY groups. The Fe-PTPY modified GCE (Fe-PTPY/GCE) was prepared in similar manner by omitting the first step of the above strategy. The reactions progress and the electrochemical behavior of the modified electrodes were studied using cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The modified electrodes showed good electrocatalytic activity for reduction of H2O2. Using hydrodynamic amperometry, under optimum conditions, calibration plots for H2O2 were linear in the ranges of 0.15-0.4 and 0.4-5.0 mM with slopes of 0.2743 and 0.2112 mu A/mM on Fe-PTPY/GCE and 0.01-0.1 and 0.1-13.0 mM with slopes of 4.91 and 0.91 mu A/mM on Fe-PTPY/OMC/GCE, respectively. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据