期刊
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 251-267出版社
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17477891.2019.1667749
关键词
Flood recovery; Visegrad countries; funding; private damage; risk reduction; mitigation
资金
- COST Action LAND4FLOOD [CA16209]
- COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) [CA16209]
- Operational Programme Research, Development and Education of the Czech Republic [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_048/0007435]
Flood recovery is an important period in the flood risk management cycle. Recently, flood recovery has become viewed as an opportunity for future flood damage mitigation. Financial flows to cover flood damages and rules regarding their allocation are crucial for supporting or undermining mitigation efforts. In this paper, we map and compare state flood recovery funding in the so-called Visegrad Group Countries (V4), i.e. Czechia, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, over the past 30 years of their democratic history. We apply a qualitative comparative approach to identify differences and similarities in risk sharing and state flood recovery funding approaches among these countries. Additionally, we reveal how risk sharing is addressed by existing flood recovery funding schemes. The results indicate that national governments have a low willingness to institutionalise ex-ante compensation schemes. Ad hoc instruments initiated shortly after disastrous flooding usually do not provide incentives to reduce future flood damages.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据