4.7 Article

Polymer Pre-Aggregation Enables Optimal Morphology and High Performance in All-Polymer Solar Cells

期刊

SOLAR RRL
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/solr.201900385

关键词

all-polymer solar cell; domain size and purity; green solvent; highly efficient; preaggregation of polymer

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21634004, 91633301, 21875073]
  2. Program for Science and Technology Development of Dongguan [2019622163009]
  3. Foundation of Guangzhou Science and Technology Project [201707020019]
  4. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, all-polymer solar cells (all-PSCs) are studied based on PTzBI:N2200 system processed from two different solvents, chlorobenzene (CB) and 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (Me-THF). It is found that the preaggregation of the donor and acceptor polymers in Me-THF is the key factor that enables a drastic enhancement in cell efficiency from approximate to 1% (processed by CB) to approximate to 11% (processed by Me-THF). When using CB as the solvent, both donor and acceptor polymers are well dissolved and mostly disaggregated. In contrast, the donor and acceptor polymers both exhibit strong aggregation in Me-THF. As a result, the donor and acceptor blend films processed from Me-THF exhibit pure domains with appropriate molecular packing structure, which leads to high charge mobilities (10(-3)-10(-4) cm(2) V-1 s(-1)) and fill factors (FFs; 75%), whereas the blend films processed by CB suffer from highly miscible and impure domains, hence decreasing the charge mobilities by 1-2 orders of magnitude compared with those of the corresponding pure films. The current work reveals that the polymer preaggregation is the key reason enabling optimal morphology and high performance in N2200-based all-PSCs, and this strategy may be potentially applied in other systems to optimize the morphology and performance of all-PSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据