4.3 Article

Microarray analysis of long noncoding RNA expression patterns in diabetic nephropathy

期刊

JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 569-576

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.11.017

关键词

Diabetic nephropathy; Long noncoding RNA; Microarray analysis; MAPK; Biomarkers

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81270896, 81100577]
  2. Six talent peaks project in Jiangsu Province [2013-WSN-049, 2015-WSN-016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Long noncoding RNAs (IncRNAs) are implicated in various biological processes and human diseases. Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We explored the potential functions of IncRNAs in DN. Methods: We established a mouse model of DN and compared IncRNA expression patterns between DN model and db/m control mouse kidney tissues using microarray analysis. IncRNA function was predicted by gene ontology enrichment and KEGG pathway analyses of IncRNAs-coexpressed mRNAs. Quantitative reverse-transcription PCR was used for validation. Cis- and trans-regulation analyses were conducted to reveal potential relationships between IncRNAs and their target genes. Results: In DN, 311 IncRNAs were dysregulated. LncRNA-coexpressed mRNAs were mainly targeted to golgi apparatus (ontology: cellular component), catalytic activity (ontology: molecular function), and mitotic nuclear division (ontology: biological process), and were mostly enriched in glutathione metabolism signaling. One hundred forty-seven IncRNAs were regarded as cis-regulatory. Several groups of IncRNAs may participate in biological pathways related to DN via trans-regulation of protein-coding genes. Conclusion: Hundreds of IncRNAs are dysregulated in DN. These IncRNAs might be involved in the pathogenesis of DN by modulating multiple molecular pathways. Our findings provide potential candidate biomarkers for predicting or diagnosing DN. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据